Final answer:
A two-sided non-aggressive message is best for persuading an audience with limited knowledge on gun control. This includes vivid, concrete language, empathy for counterarguments, and a timely approach to the issue.
Step-by-step explanation:
When delivering a persuasive message against enacting strict gun control laws to an audience that is not well-informed on the topic and has little education, it would be best to use a two-sided non-aggressive message. This approach allows you to acknowledge the counterarguments while still presenting your stance in a way that the audience can understand and possibly align with. Using vivid descriptions and concrete language will help recreate powerful images and appeal to the audience's feelings of fear and insecurity. Additionally, showing empathy for dissenting views can prevent alienating readers who might be on the fence or opposed to your viewpoint. It is also beneficial to address the timeliness (kairos) of the issue, making your argument more relevant and pressing to the audience.
Evidence and reasoning should support your viewpoint, demonstrating empathy in acknowledging differing opinions and addressing them without antagonism. Finally, to draw in the audience that may be prone to motivated reasoning, acknowledging empirical debates and grounding the discussion in factual evidence may help to overcome biases.