Final answer:
The student's pessimistic view about the outcome of their job interview being determined by fate or luck characterizes an external locus of control, which is opposite to the self-efficacy and internal locus of control that associate personal effort with outcomes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student's statement reflects an external locus of control, which is the belief that our life events are largely influenced by external factors such as fate or luck rather than our own actions. This concept is opposed to an internal locus of control, where individuals believe they can influence their outcomes through their own efforts and choices. The student's view that preparation for the job interview may not impact the result suggests a belief that outside forces will determine the outcome, indicative of an external locus of control.
Moreover, the concepts mentioned here, including self-efficacy, self-concept, self-control, and internal versus external locus of control, are all part of how individuals perceive and react to their ability to influence their lives and achievements. In contrast, someone with a high sense of self-efficacy would prepare diligently for an interview, believing their skills and efforts could significantly affect the outcome.
Finally, the personal belief in one's own capacity to deal with adverse situations, known as resilience, is crucial for career success and could enhance one's internal locus of control.