Final answer:
The broad statements of what must be done to resolve an incident are Strategic goals. These goals are high-level outcomes that contrast with more specific and granular tactics, methods, or plans such as Tactical objectives, Modes of operation, and Incident Action Plans (IAPs).
Step-by-step explanation:
Strategic goals represent the high-level outcomes that an organization or government aims to achieve in response to an incident or within the framework of a foreign policy setting. They are broad by nature, focusing on the ultimate end state that responders or policymakers desire to reach. These goals are fundamentally different from the more immediate and specific Tactical objectives, the Modes of operation which could refer to specific styles or methods of working, and the Incident Action Plans (IAPs) which are detailed documents outlining the tactics, assignments, and resources required to manage the incident.
The reference to foreign policy outputs similarly deals with broad strategic approaches versus granular actions. In this case, all the options except C. emergency spending measures, would represent sharply focused foreign policy outputs. These measures, while important, are often reactive and not as narrowly focused on foreign policy goals as other options, such as diplomatic meetings (presidential summits), military actions, or formalized partnerships (international agreements).