Final answer:
Keoh should exclude the notion that intelligence equates to the possession of superior knowledge. Instead, he should focus on the ability to learn, adapt, and problem-solve, which align with fluid and crystallized intelligence concepts.
Step-by-step explanation:
Among the provided options, Keoh should NOT include c) The possession of superior knowledge as a definitive aspect of intelligence in his definition. Intelligence involves a range of cognitive abilities, and not merely the accumulation of a lot of facts or data.
Intelligence typically includes a) The ability to learn from experience, b) The capacity to adapt to new situations, and d) The ability to solve problems. These are all part of intelligence's dynamic aspects, such as fluid and crystallized intelligence, and are not just about knowing a lot. Fluid intelligence refers to the capability to see complex relationships and solve novel problems, while crystallized intelligence involves the use of knowledge that has been acquired and retained. These competencies illustrate an individual's intellectual prowess far better than the simple retention of information.