Final answer:
Pryhoda is most likely to help a motorist when other people are present who have also stopped to help. This is influenced by the bystander effect and Pryhoda's emotional state, particularly if Pryhoda has recently been in a good mood. c) When there are other people around who have also stopped to help .
Step-by-step explanation:
Pryhoda is most likely to stop to help a motorist standing next to a car on the side of the road when there are other people around who have also stopped to help. This is due to social psychological principles such as the bystander effect, which suggest that individuals are more likely to assist if they are the only ones present and can feel a direct responsibility. On the other hand, if others are present and not helping, an individual may feel less personal obligation to intervene.
However, if Pryhoda had recently been in a good mood, this positive emotional state could also increase the likelihood of stopping to offer assistance, as emotional states can influence prosocial behavior. Factors such as being dressed in a business suit or Pryhoda being in a hurry are less likely to be significant, although they could influence the decision based on the perceived nature of the individual needing help or Pryhoda's own time constraints.
Ultimately, the decision to stop and help would likely be influenced by a combination of situational factors and Pryhoda's current state of mind. As William David Ross's concept of prima facie duty suggests, the duty to help someone in need may outweigh other considerations depending on the circumstances and Pryhoda's ability to recognize the gravity of the situation.