Final answer:
You get stronger learning in classical conditioning when the neutral/conditioned stimulus is presented before the unconditioned stimulus, leading to the acquisition phase where the neutral stimulus elicits the conditioned response. Extinction occurs when the conditioned stimulus is no longer paired with the unconditioned stimulus, causing the response to weaken.
Step-by-step explanation:
Most of the time, you get stronger learning when the neutral/conditioned stimulus is presented before the unconditioned stimulus. The process described here is known as classical conditioning, a concept in psychology where a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an unconditioned stimulus to elicit a conditioned response.
In the context of classical conditioning, extinction occurs when the conditioned stimulus is presented without the unconditioned stimulus over time, leading to the weakening of the conditioned response. Extinction demonstrates that the strength of the learned association decreases when the expected unconditioned stimulus is no longer presented following the conditioned stimulus.
As illustrated by the example of Pavlov's dogs, during the acquisition phase, the bell (neutral stimulus) becomes a conditioned stimulus when paired with the presentation of food (unconditioned stimulus). Hence, the bell alone then becomes capable of eliciting salivation (conditioned response), which is indicative of successful classical conditioning.