Final answer:
The provided information does not offer a direct answer to the student's multiple-choice question about the graffiti from Bengal's stance on English. The context delves into the broader implications of language use and cultural identity, highlighting the complexity behind linguistic diversity, language politics, and the repercussions of English's global influence on local cultures.
Step-by-step explanation:
The gist of the graffiti from Bengal regarding the use of English, as cited by Rushdie, is not provided in the information above, thereby making it difficult to provide an accurate answer to the student's multiple-choice question. However, the context provided speaks to the broader issue of linguistic diversity and the politics surrounding language use, particularly English, in various regions, including South Asia and the United States. The materials discuss the importance of recognizing and respecting the varieties of English and other languages spoken by individuals as part of their cultural identity and the challenges of cultural and linguistic hegemony that often dismisses 'nonstandard' varieties of speech.
These discussions reflect the tensions between the global dominance of English and the desire for cultural and linguistic self-determination. They explore the impact of English in countries like India and Pakistan, the debate over making English the official language in parts of the United States, and the complexities of using language to forge connections or perpetuate stereotypes. The information implies an advocacy for the respect and celebration of language diversity, rather than outright rejection or unquestioned promotion of English, pointing towards cultural assimilation as a nuanced process.