Final answer:
Gandhi believed the British government would not be able to withhold freedom from the Indian people if they practiced sufficient noncooperation (b). The strategy of nonviolent civil disobedience, including boycotts and protests like the Non-Cooperation Movement and Salt March, aimed to make British rule unworkable in India and led to independence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct option is B:
Mohandas Gandhi, known for his nonviolent philosophy, held that the British government could not sustain its control over India if the Indian people engaged in sufficient noncooperation. Gandhi's strategy was rooted in the concept of satyagraha, which means the force that is generated through adherence to truth. This idea required Indians to nonviolently refuse to comply with unjust laws and economic practices imposed by the British. The intent was not to overthrow the British violently but to make the British rule unworkable in India through peaceful resistance and civil disobedience.
Gandhi's leadership in movements like the Non-Cooperation Movement, the Salt March, and the Quit India Movement demonstrated the power of nonviolent resistance. These efforts pressured the British government and significantly contributed to the eventual withdrawal of British colonial rule in India. Through noncooperation, Gandhi and his followers exposed the economic and moral weaknesses of the British presence, eventually making it untenable for them to remain.
The Non-Cooperation Movement, in particular, discouraged the use of British goods and encouraged the revival of domestic products and processes. Civil disobedience, a method exemplified in the famous Salt March, was a way to show the Indian peoples' ability to govern themselves and their rejection of unjust laws. Gandhi's commitment to nonviolent protest was not necessarily a path of least resistance; it required significant sacrifice and discipline from participants, which ultimately paid off with the attainment of Indian independence.