Final answer:
Salman Rushdie used an unreliable narrator in the first-person narrative to reveal the difficulty of accurately recalling memories, contrasting with the omniscient perspective often found in third-person narratives.
Step-by-step explanation:
Rushdie made his narrator an unreliable narrator to convey the problems of describing his fallible memories of India. An unreliable narrator is often used in first-person narratives, where the narrator may distort the truth due to personal bias, limited understanding, or intentional deception.
This contrasts with an omniscient narrator commonly found in third-person narratives who has complete knowledge of all characters' thoughts, feelings, and actions, much like Austen's use in 'Northanger Abbey' or Martin Amis in 'London Fields'.
By choosing an unreliable narrator, Rushdie emphasizes the subjective nature of memory and the complexity of historical truths.The narrator chosen by Rushdie to convey the problems of describing his fallible memories of India is an unreliable narrator.
An unreliable narrator is a first-person narrator who cannot be trusted to tell the facts of the story correctly. They may have moral flaws or biases that make them unreliable. By using an unreliable narrator, Rushdie emphasizes the subjective and flawed nature of memory and the challenges of accurately portraying personal experiences.
Therefore answer is b) Unreliable.