232k views
0 votes
Garcia; taste aversion (and how it differs from classical conditioning) and biological preparedness.

a. Garcia's research demonstrated that taste aversion is a form of classical conditioning that occurs with food.
b. Taste aversion differs from classical conditioning in that it is a more rapid and intense form of learning.
c. Biological preparedness refers to the idea that certain associations are easier to learn due to evolutionary factors.
d. Taste aversion is a type of classical conditioning that is exclusively influenced by biological preparedness.

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Taste aversion is a specialized form of classical conditioning where a single experience can lead to a long-lasting aversion to a certain food, facilitated by biological preparedness which makes some associations easier to learn due to evolutionary factors.

Step-by-step explanation:

John Garcia's research on taste aversion demonstrates that it is a form of classical conditioning but with certain distinct attributes. Unlike typical classical conditioning, taste aversion often occurs rapidly, through just a single exposure, and the learned association can happen over a long delay between the conditioned stimulus and the unconditioned stimulus. For instance, if someone becomes ill hours after eating a specific food, they might develop an aversion to that food, even if it was not the actual cause of the illness.

Biological preparedness plays a crucial role in taste aversions; organisms are evolutionarily predisposed to make certain associations over others. Garcia's experiments with rats showed that while rats could easily be conditioned to associate a taste with illness, they did not readily associate visual or auditory cues with sickness. This suggests that biological factors influence the ease or difficulty of conditioning certain responses, hence making taste aversion a unique form of learning influenced by biological preparedness.

User Eugene Braginets
by
8.0k points