Final answer:
Wallace Stevens, unlike Robert Frost, did not write for the aristocracy nor focus on international issues, politics, or experimental forms. His poetry, rooted in the ordinary, blended reality with imagination and remained accessible despite his unconventional approach compared to Frost's more traditional and regional work.
Step-by-step explanation:
Unlike Robert Frost, Wallace Stevens did not write for the aristocracy and was not interested in international issues, politics, or experimental forms. Stevens, an American modernist poet, frequently engaged with themes of the commonplace and conjoined the realms of reality and imagination. His early poetry in Harmonium and later in The Collected Poems of Wallace Stevens highlights this focus on the ordinary mingled with the imaginary. Stevens's poetry, praised for its technical sophistication and accessibility, contrasted with Frost's more traditional approach, which often drew from New England's natural beauty and everyday subjects. While Frost is known for his clear, accessible poems reflective of the New England landscape and daily life, Stevens embraced his dual life as both an insurance executive and poet, seeing no conflict in pursuing a career in commerce while also crafting poetry.
Stevens's notable works, such as 'The Emperor of Ice-Cream' and 'Of Modern Poetry,' showcase his poetic philosophy—one that melds the simplicity of everyday experiences with the demands of the imagination, offering a distinctly American voice that diverges from Frost's, who is cherished for his evocation of a simpler, more recognized past. In the end, both poets offered unique contributions to the American literary canon through their distinctive views on poetic expression and the role of the poet in society.