28.7k views
0 votes
Stony Brook University realized that it has not had its buildings inspected since 1971, so hiring 150 highly experienced engineers and giving them inspection freedom was the only course. Now, 18 months later, without inspections complete and $34 million over budget, Stony Brook University acknowledges that its incompetence could have been prevented by which step in Analysis Process?

A) Data Collection
B) Definition of Scope
C) Background Research
D) Data Organization

User ShPavel
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Stony Brook University could have prevented overruns by properly defining the scope in the Analysis Process, crucial for setting project objectives and resources, mirroring the significance of thorough planning in successful engineering projects like the Golden Gate Bridge.

Step-by-step explanation:

Stony Brook University acknowledges that its oversight in the inspection process could have been prevented by 'Definition of Scope,' which is crucial in the Analysis Process. Defining the scope involves outlining the boundaries and extent of the project, along with a clear understanding of the resources, timeline, and objectives. A well-defined scope would have likely helped in setting realistic timelines and budgets for the engineering inspections, helping to avoid the extended completion time and budget overrun. Just as in the examples of the Golden Gate Bridge and Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse, utilizing appropriate mathematics and science is key to successful engineering projects. The Golden Gate Bridge stands as a testament to a well-executed design and maintenance plan, whereas the Tacoma Narrows Bridge failure exemplifies the catastrophic results of inadequate planning and application of scientific principles.

User Alen Smith
by
8.7k points