Final answer:
The author sarcastically states that they will not address the plight of the elderly and infirm because they are perishing naturally due to neglect, using this as a sharp critique of societal indifference. The statement should be viewed within a context that recognizes the severity of providing for an aging population in a sustainable manner, which is a pressing issue in many countries.
Step-by-step explanation:
The author states they will not address the problem of the large number of people who are old, disabled, and dying because they believe that this demographic is declining naturally due to harsh living conditions.
This sentiment is expressed through a satirical lens, suggesting a lack of need for intervention as the author asserts that these individuals are 'dying, and rotting, by cold and famine, and filth, and vermin, as fast as can be reasonably expected.'
Despite the author's stance, it is crucial in public policy to provide retirement and health benefits especially with the challenge of an aging population and a shrinking workforce, as is noted in many advanced economies, including the United States, European nations, and Japan.
Furthermore, within the broader context of population growth and resource allocation, there are ethical and practical concerns around how societies should manage these challenges without compromising human dignity or resorting to inhumane suggestions.