Final answer:
The play 'Macbeth' depicts human nature as morally neutral, highlighting both the capacity for good and evil within individuals. This is reflective of the internal conflict and choices Macbeth faces, as well as the broader philosophical debate on the nature of human morality.
Step-by-step explanation:
The play Macbeth by William Shakespeare can be interpreted as portraying human nature as complex and capable of both good and evil, rather than inherently good or evil. This complexity is evident in Macbeth's internal conflict and the actions he takes throughout the play.
In one moment, Macbeth recognizes the moral ambiguity of the witches' prophecy, stating, "This supernatural soliciting] Cannot be ill, cannot be good." Similarly, his actions following Duncan's murder, where his love and fury lead him to act beyond the bounds of reason, suggest a morally neutral stance, where circumstances and emotions can greatly influence a person's choices.
The philosophical ideas presented by various thinkers about the nature of good and evil highlight the ongoing debate about whether humans are inherently good, naturally evil, or if moral definitions are subjective and fluid.
In addition, the representation of human nature in Macbeth's violent deeds, described as "The multiplying villanies of nature," underscores a more pessimistic view of humanity, aligning with conservative beliefs from the early nineteenth century that mankind is fundamentally depraved.
Considering all of these angles, Macbeth portrays the nature of man as morally neutral (C). Humans in the play are shown to possess the capacity for both tremendous kindness and unspeakable cruelty, indicating that their actions are a product of personal choices rather than a predetermined moral orientation.