Final answer:
Among the provided statements, (c) 'A registered owner of a fee simple may lose his or her interest in land through the operation of the principle of indefeasibility even though nothing has been done to deserve the loss.' is FALSE. This statement contradicts the purpose of the principle, which is safeguarding, rather than undermining, the rights of registered owners.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves understanding the principle of indefeasibility, which is a legal concept in property law that protects the rights of innocent purchasers of land and other forms of real estate. It means that once a person's rights to property are registered, they cannot usually be challenged or removed by a third party. A false statement among the provided options is one that doesn't align with the general understanding of the principle of indefeasibility.
Statement (c) 'A registered owner of a fee simple may lose his or her interest in land through the operation of the principle of indefeasibility even though nothing has been done to deserve the loss.' is false. The principle of indefeasibility is designed to protect registered owners, not to cause them loss without reason. This statement is contrary to the very purpose of the principle of indefeasibility, which is to ensure that a purchaser who has acquired land in good faith, and for valuable consideration, from the registered owner, will have an indefeasible title that cannot be challenged.
The other statements align with the general understanding of how the principle works in regard to protecting the rights of innocent parties and its application to registered charges against the property, as well as acknowledging an exception concerning short-term leases with a tenant in occupation.