Final answer:
The statement equating the motive to avoid failure with the fear of failure is false. These concepts relate to an individual's attitudes toward failure but can have different impacts on behavior, depending on one's self-efficacy and locus of control.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the motive to avoid failure and fear of failure are two terms for the same theoretical construct that leads to repeated failure rather than success is false. While both involve attitudes towards failure, they can manifest differently and have different effects on behavior. The motive to avoid failure often involves a preoccupation with the avoidance of embarrassment or criticism, which can lead to procrastination or disengagement from challenging tasks. Fear of failure, while similarly focused on negative outcomes, can sometimes propel individuals to work harder to avoid such outcomes. In contrast, high self-efficacy and an internal locus of control are associated with a more proactive approach to challenges and resilience in the face of setbacks.
As per Albert Bandura, self-efficacy is crucial for motivation, as it reflects one's belief in their own ability to successfully complete tasks. On the other hand, the concept of locus of control, as proposed by Julian Rotter, distinguishes between internal and external perceptions of control over one's life outcomes. Those with an internal locus of control attribute their successes or failures to their own actions, while those with an external locus of control may attribute them to external factors.
Understanding these concepts is vital because an individual's beliefs about their abilities and control can significantly impact their motivations and actions, potentially leading to different patterns of behavior and, consequently, success or failure.