Final Answer:
There are two types of code analysis: Automated and Static. Both of them detect Mistakes but the main difference between them lies in where they find these Faults within the Repository. Thus the correction option is B. Automated / Static / Mistakes / Faults / Defects / Repository.
Step-by-step explanation:
Code analysis involves two main types: Automated and Static. Automated code analysis is dynamic and focuses on runtime behavior, detecting faults or defects, such as mistakes that can lead to failures in the code.
On the other hand, Static code analysis is comprehensive and examines the code without executing it, identifying issues like vulnerabilities and bugs within the repository before runtime. In this context, the correct option is B, as it accurately reflects the distinction between Automated (Dynamic) and Static code analysis, their respective detections (Mistakes/Faults), and where these issues are found (Repository).
Automated code analysis, being dynamic, simulates the code execution to identify mistakes or faults that may result in defects during runtime. This type of analysis is crucial for assessing the real-time performance and behavior of the code.
On the contrary, Static code analysis is performed without executing the code, providing a thorough examination of the codebase to detect mistakes, faults, or defects at the source code level within the repository. This distinction is vital for efficient debugging and quality assurance throughout the development process.
In summary, the choice of Automated and Static code analysis depends on the nature of issues one aims to detect, whether they are runtime faults (Automated) or static flaws within the source code (Static). The correct answer, option B, aptly captures this difference and aligns with industry practices for effective code analysis.
Thus the correction option is B. Automated / Static / Mistakes / Faults / Defects / Repository.