Final answer:
Proponents of emotional intelligence believe that IQ scores do not capture all aspects of human intelligence and argue that emotional intelligence, with its focus on areas like empathy and self-regulation, is a better predictor of personal and professional success.
Step-by-step explanation:
Proponents of emotional intelligence argue that IQ scores fail to encompass the full scope of human intelligence. They believe that factors like self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills, all aspects of emotional intelligence, are essential to success in life and can significantly influence an individual's performance both personally and professionally. These proponents contend that solely relying on IQ scores, which traditionally measure cognitive abilities such as memory, analytical skills, and reasoning, provides an incomplete picture of an individual's capabilities. Furthermore, they argue that emotional intelligence is a better predictor of success in life, as it affects how we manage our emotions, navigate social complexities, and make personal decisions that achieve positive results. The argument suggests that emotional intelligence may compensate for lower IQ scores, as strong emotional intelligence skills can lead to effective leadership, empathy, and better interpersonal relationships, despite not being measured by traditional IQ tests.