Final answer:
Science is neutral on the existence of God because it deals only with empirical evidence and the natural world. Philosophical and theological questions about God transcend the limits of science, making God's existence a matter of faith and personal belief rather than something that can be proven or disproven scientifically.
Step-by-step explanation:
Does science tell us that god cannot exist? The answer to this question is B) No, science is neutral on the existence of God. Science, by its nature, is limited to empirical study and evidence-based understanding of the natural world. It does not venture into the realm of the supernatural, which is where the concept of God typically resides. While some individual scientists may hold personal beliefs regarding the existence or non-existence of God, science as a discipline does not provide tools or methodologies to prove or disprove God's existence. In fact, the very nature of God in many religious traditions is beyond the empirical and often considered unfalsifiable.
Many arguments for and against the existence of God are fraught with logical challenges, such as the classic 'Who created God?' or 'Where did the laws of physics come from?' These questions spotlight the limitations of human reasoning and evidence when dealing with topics that transcend the material world. Philosophical arguments like those from Anselm or Aquinas have been proposed in favor of an existing God, using logic and metaphysics rather than empirical science. However, these arguments are not universally accepted and do not stem from scientific inquiry.
In conclusion, science does not affirm, deny, actively promote atheism, or consider itself capable of investigating the existence of a supreme being. The belief in God remains a matter of faith, personal conviction, and philosophical reasoning rather than scientific evidence.