Final answer:
The historical context of Mongol rule and succession reveals a pattern of familial or clan connections between rulers and successors, marked by frequent internal conflicts and external challenges.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question seems to confuse historical events and figures, as there is no record of Yahiya Khan being ousted in 1747 by the individuals mentioned. However, in a broader historical context, there are instances of political upheaval and succession crises throughout the Mongol Empire and its successor states.
For instance, the Delhi Sultanate saw frequent bouts of civil war over succession. Similarly, Kublai Khan's death marked the beginning of a succession crisis for the Yuan dynasty.
Regarding the relation between a ruler and their successor, within the Mongol Empire, succession was often discussed and decided in a kurultai, and the successions were usually between individuals who had familial or clan connections.
Moreover, in Mongol and related societies, figures such as Ghazan Khan and Ayurbarwada adapted to local cultures and political climates, leading to various rulers' diverging governance styles and adherence to religious practices.
The linear history of Mongol rulers and their descendants shows a complex pattern of inheritance and succession often marked by internal conflicts and external challenges, reflecting the tumultuous and inter-connected history of Mongol rule across Eurasia.