113k views
3 votes
What are the differences between Archaic and Classical texts, and how is it used in Archeology?

A. Archaic: Fragmentary and poetic. Classical: More complete and historical. Used to understand cultural practices.
B. Archaic: Complex and literal. Classical: Straightforward and symbolic. Used for precise dating of artifacts.
C. No significant differences between Archaic and Classical texts in archaeological interpretation.
D. Archaic: Straightforward. Classical: Elaborate and metaphorical. Used to interpret artistic symbolism on artifacts.

User Liem Do
by
8.6k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

Archaic texts are more fragmentary and poetic, aiding the understanding of cultural practices, while Classical texts are more historical, assisting in detailed interpretations of Greek culture and artistic symbolism.

Step-by-step explanation:

The differences between Archaic and Classical texts, as they are used in Archaeology, primarily relate to their content, form, and historical context. Archaic texts, spanning roughly from 800 to 480 BCE, are often more fragmentary and poetic, including works like the Iliad and the Odyssey. These texts and artifacts from the period, like monumental sculpture and red-figure pottery, help archaeologists understand cultural practices and the development of Greek life and political systems, such as the early concepts of democracy in Athens.

In contrast, Classical texts from 480/479 to 323 BCE tend to be more complete and historical in nature, providing a rich source for detailed archaeological interpretations of Greek culture. The Classical period, which is further subdivided into the Early, High, and Late Classical periods, saw significant advancements in naturalistic artistic representations, as evidenced by works like the Kritios Boy and the frescos from Vergina. These texts and artifacts are critical in interpreting artistic symbolism and understanding the evolution of Greek culture and society during this era.

User JanBrus
by
7.9k points