Final Answer:
It allows parties to find a middle ground by making concessions, fostering resolution without dominating or avoiding the issue. Therefore, The correct option is D) Compromising (Moderately assertive, moderately cooperative because compromising strikes a balance between assertiveness and cooperativeness, making it the most suitable choice for accommodating (unassertive, cooperative) situations.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the given scenario, the style that best aligns with being unassertive yet cooperative is compromising. Compromising involves finding a middle ground where both parties make concessions to reach an agreement. This approach reflects a moderate level of assertiveness and cooperativeness, making it the most suitable option.
Firstly, let's break down the options. Collaborating (A) is assertive and cooperative, which does not match the unassertive nature required. Avoiding (B) is both unassertive and uncooperative, Competing (C) is assertive and uncooperative, and Compromising (D) strikes a balance between assertiveness and cooperativeness. By process of elimination, Compromising is the most fitting choice.
Secondly, compromising involves each party giving up something to meet in the middle. It's like finding the average between two extremes. In a conflict situation, it's crucial to maintain a balance between standing one's ground and being flexible. Compromising allows for resolution without dominating or avoiding the issue entirely. This approach encourages collaboration while acknowledging the needs and preferences of all involved parties.
In conclusion, the answer is Compromising (D) because it aligns with the requirement of being unassertive yet cooperative. This approach ensures a fair resolution by finding a middle ground where both assertiveness and cooperativeness are balanced.