Final answer:
Mike's tendency to use intimidation as a motivator is consistent with Theory X, which posits that employees are inherently lazy and need to be controlled through punishment. Theory Y contrasts this by assuming people are naturally hardworking and productive, seeking and flourishing under trust and responsibility.
Step-by-step explanation:
Mike's belief that intimidating employees by using fear as a motivator aligns with Theory X. Theory X assumes that people are inherently lazy and unproductive and that they need to be controlled and managed through a system of rules and punishments to ensure they fulfill organizational goals. This management style views employees as disliking work, avoiding responsibility, and having the desire to be directed. On the other hand, Theory Y posits that people are naturally hardworking and productive, seek responsibility, and are satisfied by taking part in setting their own work goals. These assumptions lead to a management style that is based on trust, valuing employees' input, and incentivizing through rewards rather than punishments. Therefore, the statement that Mike's approach is consistent with Theory X is true.