Final answer:
The cost of sport injury in 2004 would include considerations of direct and indirect financial impacts and vary depending on several factors. Exact figures would require referencing specific studies or reports on the economic burden of sports injuries during that year, which are not provided in the question.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question regarding the cost of sport injury in 2004 pertains to financial impacts and possibly health economics related to sports injuries during that year.
This information typically emerges from research studies or health economic analyses that assess the direct and indirect costs associated with sports injuries, including medical treatment, rehabilitation, and loss of productivity.
In answering such a query, one would typically look for studies or reports by health economists, governmental organizations, or sports bodies that might have published data on the economic burden of sports injuries for the specified year.
It is important to consider that the specific figure for the cost of sport injuries in 2004 may vary depending on the country, the type of sport, the level of play (amateur vs. professional), and the inclusiveness of the costs considered (e.g., only direct medical costs vs.
including indirect costs such as lost work). Additionally, the source of this information, as credited in the question, namely Parissa Safai, would likely need to be referenced to find the exact figure discussed.
Therefore, without access to the specific study or report mentioning these costs, it is not possible to provide the exact figure.
However, a general understanding can be gleaned from available literature and statistical data on sports injuries and their economic impact from that period.