Final answer:
Procedural justice refers to the fairness of processes used in determining outcomes, such as the distribution of rewards in an organization. It is essential for maintaining perceived fairness and preventing negative workplace behaviors. Distributive justice, on the other hand, is about the fair allocation of wealth, goods, and services in society.
Step-by-step explanation:
​Procedural justice is the perceived fairness of the process used to determine the distribution of rewards. This concept is vital within organizations as it affects employee perception of fairness and can influence workplace behavior.
For example, when procedural justice is considered high, individuals are likely to perceive outcomes as fair even if they are not beneficial to them. Conversely, when procedural justice is perceived as low, individuals might resort to negative behaviors such as workplace theft, as demonstrated by the research of Greenberg (1993).
The concept of distributive justice deals with the moral framework that governs the distribution of wealth, goods, and services, aiming for the greatest amount of fairness.
Theories such as those proposed by John Rawls have contributed significantly to the discussion on distributive justice, emphasizing principles like ensuring everyone is entitled to their holdings under the distribution.
It is also important to recognize various ideologies' practical applications of distributive and procedural justice principles when considering public versus private resources and market restrictions. These views significantly impact governing bodies and ultimately affect all societal members.