Final answer:
Objectivity and subjectivity are interconnected in communication, as complete objectivity is challenging due to inherent biases. Sociologists must strive to overcome these biases and report findings truthfully, even when they contradict personal views. Strategies like abstracting from specific circumstances aim to reduce subjective bias.
Step-by-step explanation:
In sociological context, objectivity and subjectivity are often discussed in terms of research and communication. While some sociologists strive for objectivity, eliminating personal biases and avoiding the skewing of data to align with a predetermined outcome, it is largely acknowledged that complete objectivity is challenging to achieve. This is because our experiences and perspectives are inherently subjective, and it is difficult to detach wholly from these biases when studying social institutions.
Nonetheless, there is an ethical obligation to report research findings truthfully, even when such findings contradict the researcher's personal views or widely accepted beliefs. In light of this, it is suggested that objectivity and subjectivity are interconnected in communication. Researchers are encouraged to acknowledge potential biases and view sociological studies as presenting one form of truth—a fact-based perspective influenced by the researcher's point of view.
To approach philosophical problems with less subjective bias, strategies such as abstraction from specific circumstances can be employed. This involves using imagination to separate specific properties of one's experience from the broader worldview, thus striving for a concept that is general and more objective. However, this does not entirely eliminate subjectivity but rather allows one to consider perspectives beyond their personal and limited experience.