Final answer:
The statement concerning the difficulty for a party to effectively govern without a majority is true, particularly in multiparty systems where coalition governments can be unstable and divided governments may hinder legislative progress. The correct option is A.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'No party could effectively govern due to difficulties in gaining a majority, making it hard to have an 'actual' government' is true in certain contexts. This is particularly evident in systems with multiple political parties where no single entity can easily secure a majority. This can lead to the formation of coalition governments, which might be inherently unstable. This is precisely what occurs in a voting cycle and in political landscapes with multiple choices, as the majority could cyclically prefer one policy over another without reaching a conclusive outcome.
For example, frequent shifts in coalition partners could lead to a large number of governments forming and falling within a short period, indicating instability and challenges in governance.
Moreover, in a divided government, where different branches or houses are controlled by opposing parties, it can become exceedingly difficult to pass legislation or fulfill campaign promises, further complicating the effectiveness of governance. This complexity is augmented by the fact that individual politicians may prioritize their re-election bids over party loyalty, exacerbating the difficulties in government functioning.
Hence, Option A is correct.