Final answer:
True, The statement that consent is not necessary during an emergency, as medical personnel can operate under the doctrine of implied consent. For minors, parents usually provide consent, but in emergencies, healthcare providers may proceed without it to ensure the child's immediate well-being.
Step-by-step explanation:
Consent is generally required before providing medical treatment or personal care, but the statement 'Consent is not necessary during an emergency' is True. In emergencies where a patient is incapable of giving consent due to their condition, and there is no immediate availability of a legal guardian, medical personnel are permitted to provide necessary treatment under the doctrine of implied consent.
This implies that in situations where a reasonable person would consent to treatment if they were able, the healthcare provider may assume the patient gives consent.
However, when it comes to minors, parents can provide consent on behalf of their children. Children, in many jurisdictions, often do not have the legal capacity to provide consent for themselves.
In the case of an emergency where the parent or guardian cannot be reached, healthcare providers will usually proceed with treatment to preserve the life or health of the child, under the assumption of implied consent.