66.9k views
4 votes
J. David Velleman argues that providing a euthanasia option to patients might actually constitute a harm because:

A) It gives too much power to the medical team
B) Patients might misuse the option
C) Euthanasia is always beneficial
D) Patients cannot make decisions about euthanasia

User Shreddish
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

J. David Velleman argues that providing a euthanasia option to patients might actually constitute a harm because patients might misuse the option and euthanasia is not always beneficial.

Step-by-step explanation:

J. David Velleman argues that providing a euthanasia option to patients might actually constitute a harm because patients might misuse the option and euthanasia is not always beneficial. Velleman believes that giving patients the power to make decisions about euthanasia can be problematic because it can lead to situations where patients make hasty or uninformed choices that they might regret later.

User Roc Khalil
by
8.6k points