Final answer:
Soldiers throughout history often had to fight to protect their food supplies in addition to facing enemy forces, especially during periods of shortage like WWI in Germany. They also had to defend their livelihoods when militarized, like the farmers and shopkeepers at Lexington and Concord.
Step-by-step explanation:
Soldiers in historical contexts often had to fight not only opposing armies but also the challenging circumstances that surrounded their military campaigns, including securing their provisions. Protecting their food supplies was an essential aspect of maintaining an army’s strength, morale, and capability to continue fighting.
For instance, during World War I, soldiers, especially those from Germany, faced the added pressure of ensuring their sustenance amidst blockades and widespread food shortages that also affected the civilian population. The military would prioritize food for soldiers, sometimes at the expense of civilians.
Additionally, historical conflicts show that armies, such as those at Lexington and Concord, often comprised farmers and shopkeepers who would leave their daily lives to take up arms and defend their homes, families, and resources against professional soldiers.
These individuals would risk their lives to protect their means of survival, suggesting that the fight to secure food is deeply intertwined with a fight for life and liberty.