Final answer:
Kat believes that even distribution of food and pay among soldiers would maintain inequality, but impact poverty and maintain proportional effects, mirroring concepts in economics and historic examples.
Step-by-step explanation:
Kat's belief that equality in the distribution of food and pay among soldiers would lead to an outcome where inequality remains the same because everyone would suffer or benefit proportionally. This view is similar to the idea in economics where a proportional change in income doesn't alter inequality, but can impact poverty. It's also analogous to a situation in Mao's China, indicating that the lack of incentive could lead to disaster. Furthermore, this aligns with criticisms by some feminists who argue that equal access to resources like food and shelter could diminish the need for expensive healthcare, as it would likely result in a healthier population. Thus, uniform distribution of resources, in Katharine Verdery's view, fundamentally challenges the divergent concepts of capitalist and socialist systems, specifically regarding individual incentive and collective goods.