Final answer:
In end-of-life decisions, Marc Wicclair argues that D) only the patient should decide when further treatment is futile, as it is their life at stake. This view aligns with the concept of patient autonomy, which is a fundamental principle in medical ethics.
Step-by-step explanation:
In end-of-life decisions, there is an ongoing debate about who should decide when further treatment is futile. Marc Wicclair argues that, in any situation, only the patient should decide since it is their life at stake. While others may have opinions or expertise, ultimately it is the patient's autonomy and right to self-determination that should be respected.
This view aligns with the concept of patient autonomy, which is a fundamental principle in medical ethics. Patient autonomy means that individuals have the right to make decisions about their own healthcare, including end-of-life decisions. By respecting the patient's autonomy, we support their right to make choices that align with their own values, beliefs, and goals.
It is important to note that this perspective may vary in different cultural, legal, and medical contexts. In some cases, legal systems or healthcare policies may require input from the patient's family, a medical team, or a committee of experts. However, the principle of patient autonomy remains a guiding principle in medical ethics and decision-making.