Final answer:
The statement that ethics of conduct is more fundamental than virtue ethics is a false dichotomy. Ethical frameworks each focus on different aspects of moral behavior and cannot be simply ranked as better or worse. Virtue ethics emphasizes character development, while ethics of conduct can include consequentialist and deontological perspectives which focus on outcomes and duties, respectively.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the context of yielding better results, it is not necessarily true that ethics of conduct is considered to be more fundamental than virtue ethics. This statement presents a false dichotomy since ethical frameworks cannot be deemed strictly better or worse in an absolute sense as they address different aspects of moral philosophy.
Ethical frameworks vary in their focus and application; some prioritize actions and their consequences (consequentialism), others prioritize adherence to moral duties (deontology), and some emphasize the development of moral character (virtue ethics). Pluralists like Sir William David Ross have argued that morality cannot be reduced to a single principle, suggesting the inadequacy of ranking these frameworks in a simple hierarchical order.