Final answer:
Conventional perspectives on OB tend to focus on specific ethical codes, whereas sustainable perspectives evaluate the broader consequences and benefits of behavior. Sustainable OB looks for actions that promote social well-being alongside following an ethical code, including diverse viewpoints and long-term impacts.
Step-by-step explanation:
Conventional perspectives on Organizational Behavior (OB) tend to focus on a specific ethical code or set of rules, such as those outlined by deontological frameworks, which prescribe certain duties or behaviors regardless of the outcome. Meanwhile, sustainable perspectives often take a broader view, analyzing the potential long-term benefits and consequences of behaviors on stakeholders and society at large, aligning more closely with consequentialist or virtue ethical frameworks. Sustainable perspectives seek to evaluate the morality of actions not just by adherence to a specific set of rules but also by their impact on social well-being, employee happiness, and the welfare of the community and environment.
Mohist and Confucian ethics highlight the importance of social relations and the cultivation of virtue for personal and communal well-being. This contrasts with conventional OB models, which may prioritize conformity to established norms or the punishment of unethical behavior. Feminist ethics further complicate conventional views, advocating for moral frameworks that account for the interests of historically marginalized groups and challenge traditional norms. In the realm of OB, this translates to an inclusive approach that considers a diverse array of perspectives and experiences in determining what constitutes ethical conduct.