Final answer:
Sustainable perspectives on organizational behavior take into account not only productivity but also environmental and social responsibility, while conventional perspectives focus on immediate economic outcomes. It is not accurate to say one is universally better than the other, as each has its place in organizational strategy. Long-term success is often linked with sustainability, considering the interconnectedness of societal actions and impacts.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering sustainable vs. conventional perspectives in organizational behavior, it is important to note several key distinctions. Conventional perspectives focus on productivity, profitability, and competitiveness, and they have indeed led to remarkable levels of production. However, sustainable perspectives expand upon this to incorporate a wider range of outcomes, including environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and the practice of virtues within organizations.
It is not accurate to claim that conventional perspectives are dated and that sustainable ones are always preferred. While sustainability has become increasingly important, conventional perspectives still play a significant role in understanding certain aspects of organizational behavior. Moreover, defining one as universally 'preferred' oversimplifies the complex decision-making involved in organizational management.
Furthermore, it is important to recognize that long-term success is closely tied to sustainability, as non-sustainable practices will inevitably lead to failure. Thus, more attention is being given to holistic views and the interconnectedness of actions and their consequences, both in business and in broader societal contexts.