Final answer:
Recognizing that not all stakeholders can be satisfied is an issue with the stakeholder approach, as shown when a substance abuse prevention program failed to engage local stakeholders effectively. Balancing differing stakeholder interests often involves complex tradeoffs and requires fostering mutual understanding among the various parties involved.
Step-by-step explanation:
An example of the issues with the stakeholder approach, particularly concerning network effectiveness, is c) Recognizing that satisfying all stakeholders may not be feasible. This is demonstrated in the mini-case study, where the program aimed to involve community stakeholders in a substance abuse prevention program. However, the stakeholders did not view themselves as invested in the program, leading to a lack of effective participation and inadequate feedback which is crucial for the success of any evaluation project.
The scenario emphasizes that while both external and internal stakeholders play a crucial role, it is not always possible to satisfy all parties due to the variety of competing values and interests. For instance, external stakeholders like religious leaders, local business owners, and local politicians might have a stake in the community's well-being, yet their interest in specific projects may vary based on personal or collective goals.
In the realm of design projects, stakeholders such as customers, government agencies, companies, and individuals have distinct roles and levels of influence. Balancing these various interests involves tradeoffs, as depicted in the provided examples where government decisions must cater to multiple parties with conflicting interests, such as environmental activists and ranchers or oil companies and conservationists. This illustrates the necessity of exploring competing values to foster mutual understanding among stakeholders.