Final answer:
Inconsistencies between official and operative goals occur when an organization's stated objectives do not align with its actual practices. An example is a company that declares environmental protection as a core value (official goal) but prioritizes cost-savings over sustainability (operative goal), demonstrating a practical misalignment between declared intentions and actions.
Step-by-step explanation:
Inconsistencies Between Official and Operative Goals
In an organizational context, official goals are the formal objectives that an organization claims to pursue, often articulated in mission statements or strategic plans.
In contrast, operative goals are the actual drivers of organizational behavior, which may differ significantly from the stated intentions.
Examples of Inconsistencies
An example of an inconsistency between official and operative goals can be observed when an organization officially promotes an ideal of environmental stewardship (official goal) but in practice prioritizes cost savings over sustainability measures (operative goal).
This reflects a scenario where there is a mismatch between idealistic/impossible goals and the practical actions taken by the organization.
Setting goals such as achieving zero waste or carbon neutrality can be seen as achievable and appropriate on paper, but without the necessary planning, resources, or technology, these objectives may become impracticable.
Thus, an organization might publicize ambitious environmental targets for favorable publicity, but their operative actions may not fully support these statements, revealing a practical dissonance between what is said and what is done.