Final answer:
In the classical view, managers maintain control by centralizing decision-making, aligning with an authoritarian leadership style. However, modern trends show a shift toward more democratic and team-oriented decision-making, even though it may lead to slower consensus-building and a preference for the status quo.
Step-by-step explanation:
To maintain control, the classical view suggests that managers should centralize decision-making. This approach is based on the notion that by having decisions made by a small group or a single person, it can reduce transaction costs and ensure swift execution of tasks. Centralizing decision-making often aligns with an authoritarian leadership style, where a leader issues orders and focuses intently on meeting goals.
However, it is worth noting that in recent years, there has been a move away from traditional hierarchical structures toward flatter organizations where decision-making can be more democratic and involve team members at various levels. Despite the potential for slower consensus-building, such democratic approaches can foster greater buy-in and innovation among team members.
Still, in collective decision-making, there's a tendency towards maintaining the status quo, which can inhibit change and progress. Ultimately, the choice between centralizing or decentralizing decision-making rests on the specific circumstances and goals of the organization.