Final answer:
Criticisms of the HSRC model are likely related to aspects like lack of empirical support, similar to critiques faced by other scientific models that do not encompass the full complexity of studied phenomena or are not readily testable.
Step-by-step explanation:
The criticism of the HSRC model likely revolves around a lack of empirical support, similar to the way criticisms of other scientific models, such as the "organic soup" model of the origin of life or Freud's psychoanalytic theories, highlight limitations like lack of testability, overemphasis on certain factors, or lack of consideration of gene transfer between unrelated species. Scientific inquiry and model validation often involve evaluating the empirical support of various working hypotheses to understand how the world works. For instance, in conservation biology, it's suggested to use multiple working hypotheses and evidence factors, which outweigh the classic null hypothesis testing due to considerations of model complexity and the explicit evaluation of alternative models.