Final answer:
The Patriot movement often considers the federal government to be dangerous to individual freedoms, especially in the context of laws like the Patriot Act, which expanded surveillance powers after 9/11. Historical examples of such distrust can be seen in the actions of the Sons and Daughters of Liberty, while contemporary developments show that globalization can exacerbate the influence of marginal patriot movements.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Patriot movement, a collective term for a set of various right-wing, anti-government groups in the United States, often considers the federal government to be evil and dangerous. Some within this movement view government agencies, particularly those associated with federal law enforcement or those perceived as infringing on personal liberties, as overreaching and a threat to individual freedoms.
This sentiment was intensified with the passing of laws such as the Patriot Act, which expanded government surveillance capabilities in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, and was seen by opponents as an infringement on civil liberties.
Historical instances of distrust in government can be traced back to the early days of the United States, where certain actions of the British Parliament were interpreted by the Sons and Daughters of Liberty as a conspiracy against liberty. More recently, global phenomena such as globalization have allowed marginal movements, such as the Reichsbürger movement's alignment with QAnon, to extend their influence across borders, intensifying the challenges for governments to manage such institutions.
Roger Sherman, in the Constitutional Debate of June 26, 1787, cautioned that government should not be dangerous to the liberties of those it governs, highlighting an enduring concern among those wary of governmental power.