114k views
22 votes
How were the Federalists

and Anti-Federalists
different with their views on
if a Bill of Rights is needed?

How were the Federalists and Anti-Federalists different with their views on if a Bill-example-1
User Sakeer
by
5.1k points

2 Answers

10 votes

Answer:

not an answer but its not letting me ask a question so my question is to be more specific

Step-by-step explanation:

User Crashwap
by
5.4k points
11 votes

Step-by-step explanation:

There were two sides to the Great Debate: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists did not. One of the major issues these two parties debated concerned the inclusion of the Bill of Rights. The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people. The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression.

User Dinara
by
5.4k points