Question

if we accept the premises that resources available to meet the costs of health care are finite, discuss your position on the following: (1) As a national policy, should the U.S. allocate a pre-determined level of resources and apply them to achieving "the greatest good for the greatest number" (necessarily leaving some out)? OR (2) Should the U.S. adopt the individualist approach of "those who can pay get, those who can’t pay, don’t?"

Answer 1

The question is about whether the U.S. should allocate resources for the greatest good or adopt an individualist approach in healthcare policy.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the context of limited resources for healthcare, there are two main positions that can be taken:

1. Allocating resources for the greatest good: This approach involves allocating a pre-determined level of resources to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people, even if it means leaving some individuals without access to healthcare.
2. Individualist approach: This approach suggests that healthcare should be based on an individual's ability to pay. Those who can afford it would receive healthcare, while those who cannot would not.

Both approaches have their merits and drawbacks, and the choice ultimately depends on a society's values, priorities, and political beliefs. It is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate.