Final answer:
Humans are not particularly good at affective forecasting, often misjudging their future feelings and emotions; true predictability of individual behavior is challenging, and political scientists rely on data analysis for probabilistic predictions. Understanding and regulating one's emotions through metacognition is a critical strategy for psychological preparedness.
Step-by-step explanation:
The accuracy of human affective forecasting, which involves predicting our future emotions and feelings, is a topic explored within social psychology. Research by Wilson and Gilbert suggests humans are not as adept at affective forecasting as one might assume. False is the appropriate choice because humans often overestimate the emotional impact of future events and fail to account for the myriad of factors that can alter emotional responses.
Political scientists rely on data analysis to make predictions about human behavior. However, these predictions are statistically based and do not assure the behavior of any given individual. They define probable behaviors based on previously observed patterns within groups that share similar characteristics.
Emotional responses and behaviors may also be regulated through practices such as metacognition, where one uses self-awareness and reflection to understand and potentially manage strong emotions.
In conclusion, while psychological preparedness and informed decision-making can foster resilience in the face of uncertain future events, it is critical to not overestimate predictability when it comes to individual human behavior.