Final answer:
System 1 thinking influences your judgment when it comes to the believability of a syllogism, while System 2 thinking allows for more objective evaluation based on critical analysis and logical deductions.
Step-by-step explanation:
System 1 thinking influences your judgment when it comes to the believability of a syllogism. System 1 thinking refers to fast, automatic, and intuitive thinking that is based on emotions and quick judgments.
This type of thinking can lead to biases and errors in judgment, especially when it comes to evaluating the validity of arguments or syllogisms.
System 2 thinking, on the other hand, is slower, more deliberate, and analytical thinking. It involves critically analyzing arguments, considering evidence, and making logical deductions.
When using System 2 thinking, you are more likely to evaluate the believability of a syllogism objectively.