Final answer:
The statement is false. Scientific management, emphasizing efficiency and productivity, came before the Human Relations Movement, which placed importance on the social and psychological aspects of work, thus serving as a response and alternative to scientific management.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that 'The Human Relations Movement, which emphasized the importance of the human element in job design, was replaced by the more technical aspects of Scientific Management' is false. In fact, scientific management, which was introduced by Frederick Taylor in 1911, predates the Human Relations Movement. Taylor's approach, known for its focus on efficiency and productivity, involved meticulous time-motion studies to increase output and profitability.
This method is sometimes referred to as 'stop-watch management' and was primarily concerned with the reduction of wasteful movements in factory work. It was later on that the Human Relations Movement emerged, countering the purely mechanical approach of scientific management by emphasizing the social and psychological aspects of work.
Figures such as Douglas McGregor developed theories that integrated elements of both scientific management and human relations, proposing a more nuanced understanding of workforce motivation and productivity. Therefore, rather than being a replacement, the Human Relations Movement arose as a response and alternative to the principles laid out by scientific management.