164k views
2 votes
SUMMARIZE THIS

All education starts at home. A school is bound within limits when it comes to any topic. Parents cannot rely on a school to teach their children all aspects of life. I do not think that schools are able to emphasize the impact of STIs on teenagers, many of who laugh at such topics. I believe that parents need to be open and honest with their children to give them accurate information. I am the mother of 4 boys, all coming into their teenage years. I believe that being truthful and not sheltering them from the realities of life is essential.

User Bcholmes
by
8.7k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The subject of this question is Sex Education, specifically the debate between abstinence-only programs and comprehensive sex education. Comprehensive sex education, which includes information about safer sexual practices and contraception, is more effective in reducing unintended pregnancies and STIs. However, the availability and quality of sex education in schools can vary.

Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of this question is Sex Education. The debate surrounding sex education in schools revolves around the type of sex education that should be taught, with a focus on abstinence-only programs versus comprehensive sex education programs. Research shows that comprehensive sex education, which includes education about safer sexual practices and contraception, is more effective in reducing unintended pregnancies and the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) compared to abstinence-only education. However, the availability and quality of sex education in schools can vary.

User Gxela
by
8.5k points