Final answer:
Associative learning involves linking stimuli or behaviors and includes classical and operant conditioning. The statement linking theories and laws is false because a theory does not become a law over time. Independence of events is judged by whether the probabilities multiply to equal the combined probability, and interference has two types: constructive and destructive.
Step-by-step explanation:
Understanding Associative Learning
When determining whether each example is associative or non-associative learning, we are discussing a concept in psychology, which often falls under the subject of Biology in a high school curriculum. Associative learning is when a subject links two stimuli or a behavior and a stimulus together through processes such as classical conditioning or operant conditioning. As mentioned, two forms of associative learning are (a) classical conditioning and (b) operant conditioning. It's notable that classical conditioning is sometimes also referred to as Pavlovian conditioning, but they are not two separate forms.
A common misconception is that when a theory has been accepted for a long time, it becomes a law. This is false. Theories and laws serve different purposes in science: a theory explains why something happens, and a law describes how something happens, often under certain conditions.
Adherence to the condition where P(A AND B) = P(A)P(B) signals independent events, otherwise, A and B are said to be dependent. Also, A and C being mutually exclusive when P(A AND C) = 0 is true. The concept of interference in physics has two types: constructive and destructive, the statement being true.