Final answer:
The situation described involves the defense mechanism of rationalization, as the applicant justifies lying on their resume by substituting acceptable reasons for less-acceptable real reasons. However, the option that aligns with the provided choices is 'Denial,' particularly the Denial of Responsibility. The correct answer is option C.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concept described in the question refers to a psychological defense mechanism. The most appropriate option given the context is C) Denial. In this scenario, the applicant believes that lying on their resume is justified because "everyone does it" and they think they "deserved the job."
The justification for lying—believing that it's a common practice and that their personal deservingness outweighs the dishonesty—illustrates the defense mechanism of rationalization. This is because the applicant is providing acceptable reasons for a behavior that may not be morally acceptable.
They are using rationalization to deal with the cognitive dissonance that comes from their actions conflicting with their internal ethical standards.However, if we look at the options provided and the descriptions linked to them, we can see that Denial can also play a part in such a scenario—particularly the Denial of Responsibility.
The individual is not taking responsibility for the dishonesty inherent in lying on a resume and is instead shifting the blame to external circumstances (e.g. the behavior of others and their perceived entitlement to the job). The correct answer is option C.