Final answer:
Alienated followers may be critical and engaged, while conformist followers are supportive and unlikely to focus on negativity. Passive followers lack enthusiasm and need direction, and pragmatist followers tend to perform moderately but are adaptable.
Step-by-step explanation:
When discussing followership styles and their likely perceptions by leaders, different types of followers can vary significantly in their attitudes and behaviors. For example, alienated followers are often critical and may be viewed by leaders as troublesome rather than lazy and incompetent, as they can be highly engaged but not satisfied with the status quo. Conformist followers, on the other hand, tend to be very supportive and rarely focus on negativity; they usually do not challenge organizational practices and aim to meet leaders' expectations. Passive followers are characterized by their need for constant direction and are not typically seen as enthusiastic about their work; they do the minimum required and avoid getting noticed. Lastly, pragmatist followers aim to maintain a moderate level of performance and tend to be diplomatic, avoiding extremes of behavior, thus they may sometimes appear as mediocre performers but are also adaptable and steady.