Answer:
The statement that best describes the argument presented by the classical school of thought is:
C. Joseph has made a rational choice to commit a crime, and he deserves a punishment that deters him from doing so in the future.
The classical school of thought emphasizes the concept of free will and rational decision-making in committing crimes. According to this perspective, individuals are seen as rational beings who weigh the potential benefits and consequences of their actions. If someone chooses to commit a crime, they are believed to have made a conscious decision and should be held accountable for their actions through appropriate punishment.
This viewpoint focuses on the idea of deterrence, where the severity of punishment is intended to discourage individuals from engaging in criminal behavior. It assumes that individuals have the ability to make rational choices and that imposing punishments can serve as a deterrent to prevent future crimes.
It is important to note that this perspective does not consider external factors, such as social environment, brain damage, or personality disorders, as significant factors in explaining criminal behavior. The classical school of thought primarily focuses on the individual's rational decision-making process and the consequences associated with their actions.